Little Doubt Remains About Liberal Media Beinng Involved In Global Warming Hoax

Hats off and thanks to source for publishing the following article.  Who would think that Wikipedia would be used as a propaganda tool of the liberal media for political purposes?  It sure isn't supportive of any kind of real scientific search for the truth about global warming.  It is a classic case of "buyer beware".  It is all the more reason to be skeptical and questioning about everything that comes from the mainstream media.

Also, bear in mind that wikipedia is used as a prime source of "knowledge" by our children in public schools.  Is it any wonder why they buy into ridiculous myths like man-caused global warming/climate change?  Wake up people.  The liberal elite and their mainstream media are treating us like mushrooms, keeping us in the dark and feeding us Bull$hit.
Peter

Wikipedia Begins Media Whitewash of Climate Criminal Peter Gleick

Written by John O'Sullivan | February 21 2012

Wikipedia, the “free online encyclopedia,” has set about swiftly whitewashing the self-confessed criminal conduct of climatologist, Dr. Peter Gleick. Skeptics will regard such action as further evidence that the website is an organ of man-made global warming propaganda.

Despite his full public admission to be a co-conspirator in criminal activities against the Heartland Institute, a charity sympathetic to skeptics, Wikipedia is at pains to hide the fact Peter Gleick yesterday admitted to this felony published here at the Huffington Post.

In it’s latest entry (H/T: Paul Sheridan) added today (February 21, 2012) the Wikipedia entry for fraudster, Peter Gleick reads thus:
“On February 20, 2012, Gleick issued a statement in the Huffington Post explaining that he had received anonymous documents in the mail that seemed to contain details on the climate program strategy of The Heartland Institute, a pro-business think tank. He admitted to soliciting and receiving additional material from the Institute "under someone else's name," calling his actions "a serious lapse of my own and professional judgment and ethics."^[17] Andrew Revkin wrote at the New York Times that "Gleick has admitted to an act that leaves his reputation in ruins ... " ^[18]”

How many other media outlets that claim to serve the public but are in fact controlled by our self-serving elite, will also engage in this despicable cover up?
Source

#Gator2012-02-21 17:33

Once again, Gleick is not a climatologist. I actually studied climatology at a major university and am offended that this charlatan would be elevated past the title of activist.
Gleick is at best a 'hydroclimatologist'...

'The American hydrologist Walter Langbein (1967) defined hydroclimatology as the study of the influence of climate upon the waters of the land.'

So, again, not a climatologst. Big difference. This would be like calling a geographer a geologist.

I prefer to call him a felon.